FFA Masters League

General => News => Topic started by: FML|red7z7 on March 19, 2017, 12:24:24 am

Title: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|red7z7 on March 19, 2017, 12:24:24 am
2v2v2v2 on Goldrush

Replay: http://tft.w3arena.net/replays/details/11368

Players:
:Switzerland: Noexxx (dragonite)
:Russia: Qwest (pidgey)

:USA: Worpex (scyther)
:Russia: Nick (scizor)

:Finland: kormuasd (tauros)
:Sweden: Junkerzam (dugtrio)

:Denmark: zTsoso
:Russia: b100death

Winner:
(click to show/hide)


2v2v2v2 on Market Square

Replay: pending

Players:
:Switzerland: Noexxx (charizard)
:USA: Eshan (mewtwo)

:Kazakhstan: DV
:Russia: TheGreatwall

:Germany: Shave (mewtwo)
:Sweden: Junkerzam (weezing)

:Hungaria: Tyrant (snorlax)
:Germany: weakud (Relaxo_88)


Winner:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: 4K.Grybby on March 19, 2017, 05:12:47 am
Video game on map GoldRush

and Soso play with b100!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: 4K.Grybby on March 19, 2017, 05:28:58 am
why yesterday the same players played in two games at once? (Junkerzam and Noexxx). It is strictly not correct, it was necessary to give all the players each team the opportunity to compete in a game format 2х2х2х2! All that happened yesterday is Fail, and contrary to common sense of competition and competitiveness! The organization of the League is disgusting! What's the point then was to do 4 teams of 10 players on each team, if 85% of the games played the same 5-6 players in each team?! idiots?!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: junkerzam on March 19, 2017, 06:23:43 am
why yesterday the same players played in two games at once? (Junkerzam and Noexxx). It is strictly not correct, it was necessary to give all the players each team the opportunity to compete in a game format 2х2х2х2! All that happened yesterday is Fail, and contrary to common sense of competition and competitiveness! The organization of the League is disgusting! What's the point then was to do 4 teams of 10 players on each team, if 85% of the games played the same 5-6 players in each team?! idiots?!

A player can play a maximum of 2 team matches.

anything else?
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: 4K.Grybby on March 19, 2017, 07:24:54 am
The rules state:
Scheduling rules/details
There will be 3 weeks of 4-way matches, followed by a 2v2v2v2 round. For the first 3 weeks, there will be 8 matches per week (subject to change). All the rules below apply to the first 3 weeks only:

- Scheduling will happen on a weekly basis. Only one week's matches will be announced at a time
- Teams will discuss together to decide which player is assigned to each game
- A team assigns only 1 player to each game
- Within the 3 week period, a player must play at least 2 games, and at most 3 games (put simply: 2 min, 3 max)
- There are no weekly limits, for example a player can play all 3 games in the first week and sit out the next 2 weeks if that's what the team agrees to.
Substitutions
- If for whatever reason a player from a team does not show up to a match, the team of the player has 3 options
1) They can substitute a player from their team into the match as long as they don't violate the 2 min, 3 max rule. This means if a player has 2 games played and a 3rd one scheduled, and he is chosen as a substitute for an earlier game, then that means the game he subbed now counts as his 3rd game and he cannot play his previously scheduled 3rd game.
2) That team forfeits the match and a neutral substitute plays instead (someone not in the event)
3) Forfeit the match and Computer insane substitutes.

according to the results displayed on the website, I made a calculation, and here's what happened:

1.Noex play 5 games;
2.Qwest - 5 games;
3. Eshan - 5;
4. Mog -4;
5. Dinamo, Fetta -3 games;
6. Ena, Gradient - 2 games;
7. QQs and Uther - 1 games
and it conforms to the rules? Correct me if I am wrong? but the above data I took from the website! lol!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: junkerzam on March 19, 2017, 07:38:47 am
- Within the 3 week period, a player must play at least 2 games, and at most 3 games (put simply: 2 min, 3 max)

This three week period refers to the three weeks of 4-way matches. It is obvious since the rules states:

There will be 3 weeks of 4-way matches, followed by a 2v2v2v2 round. For the first 3 weeks, there will be 8 matches per week (subject to change). All the rules below apply to the first 3 weeks only:

We then posted new rules regarding player participation for the 2v2v2v2 where the rules state:

A player can play a maximum of 2 team matches.
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: 4K.Grybby on March 19, 2017, 07:44:15 am
ok, why then QQs and Uther - play  1 games all?!  they had to play at least two.

rules were broken, and you're trying to "whitewash" admins, though it's really their blunders! that's what I wanted to say! I can also count the number of games other teams, and there will be these inconsistencies in the rules! so what is this League complete shit, if it did not respect the basic rules!

Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: 4K.Grybby on March 19, 2017, 07:46:17 am
administrators must recognize that they are not properly organized and not controlled the League! not perfected the rules! I just wanted to say it!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: ZsSuperCumulo on March 19, 2017, 09:52:53 am
@4K.Grybby I think I understand where you are coming from and it seems you are right about QQs and Uther playing only one game rather than two, but maybe they could only play one because of lack of time or just not showing up. Next time though, don't call admins idiots or this league shit, either raise your concern in a polite manner or just don't participate in the event.
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|WorpeX on March 19, 2017, 10:48:40 am
@4K.Grybby Don't quote me on this cause I was not part of the admin discussions on this since I was part of the event. However, from what I've researched every team had at least 1 player that didn't play 2 games. Uther for Ravenclaw, Suitron for Mozarts and Mr.Sweets for Ponty. From rough calculations, -1 penalty point for each offense wouldn't have changed the results. Also, I fully believe that every team tried their hardest to get these players to play.

I was extremely impressed with how well each team cooperated with the rules (which were flimsy since we never did this event before). Every player had their chance to play if they wanted it and for the most part each team got a long with each other well.

Huge credit needs to be given to all the team captains. PLEASE thank you team leaders for all their hard work before the team discord channels get taken down!!!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: qwest on March 19, 2017, 01:29:17 pm
lol
Qqs played 2 games
Uther just not come and been replaced
Others team use same replace 2-3 times
Our team only once
Thats all
Ravenclaw#1
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|red7z7 on March 19, 2017, 02:02:31 pm
The rule about minimum 2 games was to ensure any active players would get to play at least a couple games rather than being put on the bench. The rule didn't cover the situation where players quit the team or became inactive. For those cases we allowed replacements or having an extra player play 3 games. No team abused this, and everything worked out, thankfully!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|Renaud on March 19, 2017, 02:28:21 pm
Usually I would try to take the criticism seriously
But coming from the guy who left before playing a single game for his team... kind hard to think you aren't just trolling at this point ;)
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|Mog on March 19, 2017, 03:47:26 pm
As stated, QQs did play 2 matches - neon city, and boomtoen.

Uther played 1, and was scheduled for the 2nd (purity in week 3) but did not show up due to him partying too hard. I subbed into that game (it was my 3rd 1v1v1v1 game) and I asked all other team captains if it was ok beforehand. I even said we would forfeit it because I did not want to break rules, but since all other teams had a similar situation at least once, they agreed it was fine. No team really abused this rule breaking in my opinion. Anyway, just wanted to clarify - so grybby go take your bullshit back to mini Dota ;)
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: SweeT on March 20, 2017, 03:07:15 am
Wait what eshan and qwest played again in same team? Well in that case we shoulda seeded soso and tyrant on goldrush!
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|Renaud on March 20, 2017, 10:02:31 am
Wait what eshan and qwest played again in same team? Well in that case we shoulda seeded soso and tyrant on goldrush!

Eshan and Qwest only played 1 team game together
Eshan played another game with Noexxx
Qwest played another game with Noexxx

All good :)
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: Possumo on March 21, 2017, 04:29:09 am
Any chance of getting those missing replays? Random heroes on Twilight is missing too :(
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: FML|WorpeX on March 21, 2017, 06:27:40 am
Well, no one else is stepping forward with replays so I uploaded the gold rush game from my teams perspective (not obs). Best I can do!

http://tft.w3arena.net/replays/details/11368
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: b100death on March 21, 2017, 06:44:06 am
http://tft.w3arena.net/replays/details/11369/ Market square 2x2x2x2 replay
http://dropmefiles.com/PsraN Market Square 2x2x2x2 map
http://dropmefiles.com/ESwAp Gold Rush obs chat replay
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: WeAkUD on March 21, 2017, 04:49:21 pm
I was the Human btw, Relaxo88 - Snorlax was Tyrant
Title: Re: TBR Week 4 Saturday Results
Post by: vercingetorix on March 26, 2017, 05:57:57 am
MarketSquare map doesn't seem to be working -.-