or atleast a rehost from original save, considering two player dropped.
that's fair to everyone is to give each player 12 points and move on
By the way, rule book is quite clear (about discs, host or player's fault) all 4 players have to agree to replay (and do it by Monday)...doesn't say anything about admins choosing.
Just for some clarification that makes no difference...
When we rehosted, Kane was on-off lagging (showing him on the lag screen) then Ebo was showing on lag screen and went down the countdown and was dropped, but as soon as he was dropped so was I and I think 1 other OBS. So it was clearly not just Ebo's connection.
On the other hand, from watching the game up until the 1v1... the points turned out the same way the game would've turned out, maybe with the exception of maga getting 11 points.
Eshan, Ebo got smashed anyway.
By the way, rule book is quite clear (about discs, host or player's fault) all 4 players have to agree to replay (and do it by Monday)...doesn't say anything about admins choosing.
This. You don't need to me to make any decisions. The rule book has your answer. If all 4 players agree to replay it, replay it (as long as its by monday). If not, sucks for those who disconnected. It makes for terrible games but their is nothing we can do about it.
[/b]By the way, rule book is quite clear (about discs, host or player's fault) all 4 players have to agree to replay (and do it by Monday)...doesn't say anything about admins choosing.
This. You don't need to me to make any decisions. The rule book has your answer. If all 4 players agree to replay it, replay it (as long as its by monday). If not, sucks for those who disconnected. It makes for terrible games but their is nothing we can do about it.
That's akin to saying that if during a poker game, one side of the game room collapses and buries 2 players, and the organizers say: "yeah, if all players want to replay this, sure, otherwise your loss, other 2 players get your money."
It's up to the organizers to facilitate a fair environment for all players. If it's clearly new host's fault that a player disconnects, it's up to the organizers to re-host the game so it is once again fair to everyone.
1.HealingWind hosted
2.After 5 min everyone was fine
3.We played normally for over 1 hour
4.Whatever the fuck happened, everyone disced
5.Some piece of shit new host re-hosted
6.Me and Kane lagged out within 5 minutes of new host
7.The match goes on? You're saying this is fair?
Worpex is pretty clearly burying his head in the sand on this one, as are other admins. Noone wants to get flamed after making a hard decision.
Well, Worpex, honestly, I'm not going to flame. Just tell me that you admins are not going to enforce a replay on this, and I can leave the league on friendly terms instead of coming back to argue with dumbasses like a few posters above.
Or if it's easier, vote on it, yay or nay: There are 3 admins, so it makes it easy to decide, and not one takes the flak.
Option 1: leave points as they are
Advantages:
1. No need to spend time/effort replaying
2. Ebo leaves the league, everyone rejoices and celebrates with a victorious lan orgy
Disadvantages:
1. You basically state that you don't give a shit about providing a fair playing environment for everyone in the league
Option 2: enforce and facilitate a re-play
Disadvantages:
1. Time and effort to facilitate scheduling
Advantages:
1. You prove that you are willing to make a hard decision to make fair
2. You retain ebo the troll who provides awesome entertainment for everyone, clearly
If kane and ebo dropped how the fuck did Starshaped beat Maga? When the replay posted ended they had about the same amount of gold and Maga had 9-9-9 heroes vs SS's lvl 2 paladin.