Sure ,if you tell us your real account name, we can let you play.
And about the format, it's just the easiest and best way to get a good player for next season, not sure if it was ugris own idea with the 16 player format :D
Lol, its persuade trolling.
@EBO: Yes ,they're 4 player games and I know battlefield has a Tavern... pretty sure SS does too buuuut might wanna check that I haven't played that one in awhile.
I completely understand that you believe it to be boring/too good and should be teamed, but I can't make it fit together with your other (and in my opinion much more valid point) about wanting to play for the win and not play for an adequate amount of points.
Teaming cheesers is playing for the win. People are soooo delusional about being able to beat an am mk pal human or dr sh tc orc in the endgame (past 6/6/6)
Cheerio, in regards to cheese, I am basically saying that shit like am mk pal or bm sh tc needs to be teamed and punished hard. But people continue to ignore it, then lose to it and wonder why.
EDIT : there is a good idea thjough behind ebo's usual demantia.
Try to find a system where there are no points, or at least only winner get some points
Aww thanks
I know it`s hell to figure out rankings without points, not sure what can be done about it. But I really hate when people don't play for the win, I seriously start having rage issues because of this.
Outside of elves, everyone continues to ignore the problem of cheese. It's boring as hell to watch and absolutely disgusting how people go for personal problems vs each other instead of teaming the cheesers first. Am / mk / pal or bm / sh/ tc in game ===> team them out. Shit's way too stupidly op and makes games insanely boring.
You still fail to comprehend the fact that people care about winning more than anything. Mog is probably the only player that constantly picks a non cheese starting hero, but because people want to win, they will pick a hero composition that gives them the highest chance.
Sure a beastmaster here or a pitlord there might work, but generally vs the best players, you need to use the best heroes.
I'm all for using my fun compositions in a friendly game, or even an early round in the season, but when winning is the most important part of a game, such as the semis/finals, going a non standard composition will cost you the game.
I get that, people do what they wanna do. I'm just saying when this happens, others have to team them, instead of focusing on personal squabbles. And if there are 4 cheesers in game, they can fight each other fair, it's all good.
FFA is alive thanks to FML and Ugri's ladder. Thanks to all of you for continuing to keep it alive, and become even bigger than before. Glad to see more players join.
Also, elves are winning, thank god. I'm still afraid one of the randoms in the finals will go the typical am mk pal crap.
What I didn't like:
Same as every other season. I've said it many times, and will say it again, FFA should be played for the win, not for points. There should be no points given except for winning. Maybe for top score you can give 1 point. 10/10/5 system is really detrimental to idea of ffa where it's all about last man standing. Everyone should be playing for the win, not points. Mentality of "yeah it's ok I'll suicide this guy, and get at least 10 points, or if I'm lucky still pull off a win" should be gone. It's really against the spirit. But just IMO, I'm sure most people would disagree.
Outside of elves, everyone continues to ignore the problem of cheese. It's boring as hell to watch and absolutely disgusting how people go for personal problems vs each other instead of teaming the cheesers first. Am / mk / pal or bm / sh/ tc in game ===> team them out. Shit's way too stupidly op and makes games insanely boring.
Show Posts